Go to the KQED website and read their own history. What was the point and benefit to us of all those buying and selling studio locations? Does it Really need a secret deal with big bad Chevron, that is probably against the 'public interest'? Don't you miss 'Newsroom' and all the roundtable open and honest political discussion, if you even have a high school diploma and can remember?
For a 'public tv station' , i want to see the books. What are you at KQED afraid of? Is not 'honesty still a good policy' ? How much do these irritant donor nags make ? Has buying the other local PBS stations been for 'the public benefit' or just KQED's Ego ?
Why has so little been produced locally by KQED ? And so little of major quality like the other PBS stations ?
It is only a tv station,,, And we , the public, have so little say, even if you contribute. Money is not the vote / opinion , in spite of what those fools on the Supreme Court say. Why is KQED hiding so much of what they do ?
Like local famous John Muir, i put much more true value in spending $M and even $B and $T("tax the rich!!", you've got to pay to succeed here, not be Euro trash royals like the public owed you a gilded cage,,,) on cleaning up the toxic and open sewer of SFBay, and the California environment ,,, over Any tv station,,, any day.
